Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
| library:thoracolumbar_spine [2025/03/11 18:43] – [Tips and Tricks] scott | library:thoracolumbar_spine [2026/07/20 13:56] (current) – scott | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| - | =====Thoracolumbar Spine MRI===== | + | ======Thoracolumbar Spine MRI====== |
| - | ====Scan Coverage and Planning==== | + | =====Scan Coverage and Planning===== |
| - | The thoracolumbar spine (TL Spine) is the more complex area of the CNS to scan clinically, as the coverage is much broader since both the full thoracic spine and lumbar spine are included. There are various | + | The thoracolumbar spine (TL Spine) is the more complex area of the CNS to scan clinically. The coverage is much broader since both the full thoracic spine and lumbar spine are included. There are various |
| ===Whole Spine Coverage=== | ===Whole Spine Coverage=== | ||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
| With Whole Spine coverage, the FOV for sagittal series should extend from T3 to S2. **Be sure to plan an ODD number of slices to ensure there is at least one true mid-sagittal image.** There are several difficulties and limitations with whole spine imaging: | With Whole Spine coverage, the FOV for sagittal series should extend from T3 to S2. **Be sure to plan an ODD number of slices to ensure there is at least one true mid-sagittal image.** There are several difficulties and limitations with whole spine imaging: | ||
| - The maximum FOV for scanners varies, and may be limited by the size of the dog, so whole spine coverage is only appropriate for small to medium breeds | - The maximum FOV for scanners varies, and may be limited by the size of the dog, so whole spine coverage is only appropriate for small to medium breeds | ||
| - | - The maximum number of coils that may be active at a time may be limited | + | - The maximum number of coils that may be active at a time may be limited |
| - Positioning becomes more difficult, as slight curvatures of the spine will limit the accuracy of sagittal imaging, necessitating repositioning, | - Positioning becomes more difficult, as slight curvatures of the spine will limit the accuracy of sagittal imaging, necessitating repositioning, | ||
| - The scanning technologist will have to do a lot of ' | - The scanning technologist will have to do a lot of ' | ||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
| ===Separate Thoracic and Lumbar=== | ===Separate Thoracic and Lumbar=== | ||
| - | With separate Thoracic and Lumbar sagittal acquisitions, | + | With separate Thoracic and Lumbar sagittal acquisitions, |
| + | |||
| + | **Lumbar sagittal FOV: T11 to S2** | ||
| + | |||
| + | **Thoracic sagittal FOV: T3 to L3** | ||
| + | |||
| + | Much like all sagittal planning in the spine, **be sure to use and ODD number of slices**. One important consideration for separate sagittal acquisitions is that it is necessary to ensure overlap between the two acquisitions, | ||
| + | |||
| + | * **The vessels may not be on the mid sagittal slice**, but rather a parasagittal image, as shown below. The mesenteric arteries are circled in red. | ||
| + | * **The vessels are not always located in the same place**; be sure to communicate with the clinician which disc or vertebrae the vessels are under | ||
| {{: | {{: | ||
| - | ====Sagittal Plane==== | + | ====Sagittal Plane Upper and Lower==== |
| - | On a dorsal image, plan the slices parallel with the spinal cord, with the slices | + | On a dorsal image, plan the slices parallel with the spinal cord, with the slice coverage |
| {{: | {{: | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{: | ||
| ====Axial Plane==== | ====Axial Plane==== | ||
| Line 31: | Line 42: | ||
| On a mid-sagittal image, plan axial slices perpendicular to the spinal cord. Unlike the cervical spine, the angle for the intervertebral disc and the spinal cord are very well aligned and can be considered equivalent. There are two variations of axial acquisitions, | On a mid-sagittal image, plan axial slices perpendicular to the spinal cord. Unlike the cervical spine, the angle for the intervertebral disc and the spinal cord are very well aligned and can be considered equivalent. There are two variations of axial acquisitions, | ||
| - | * **Multi Stack**: With disc disease, extrusions tend to be fairly localized, though in rare cases may extend cranially or caudally. Multi Stack is often appropriate and more time efficient for this, especially when assessing a large number of discs. It is good practice to use 3-7 slices, centered on the disc, for each disc. where pathology is suspected, it is also good practice to use enough axial slices to extend to the mid-body of the vertebrae above and below the suspected disc extrusion to catch any disc material not well visualized on a sagittal image. On the Multi Stack plan shown below, note the angle required at the LS junction; significant slice overlap will cause artifact, and in some cases may need to be consolidated into a Single Stack. | + | * **Multi Stack**: With disc disease, extrusions tend to be fairly localized, though in rare cases may extend cranially or caudally |
| - | * **Single Stack**: With spinal cord pathology such as FCE or myelopathy, disc assessment is less important. Single Stack is most appropriate in this situation. It is good practice to acquire the axial stack from normal cord-to-normal cord if possible. | + | |
| - | {{:library:lspineaxplansinglestack.png? | + | {{:library:lspineaxplanmultistack.png?600|}} |
| + | |||
| + | * **Single Stack**: With spinal cord pathology such as FCE or myelopathy, disc assessment is less important. Single Stack is most appropriate in this situation. It is good practice to acquire the axial stack from ' | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{:library:lspineaxplansinglestack.png? | ||
| ====Dorsal Plane==== | ====Dorsal Plane==== | ||
| - | On a mid sagittal image, plan the slices parallel with the spinal cord. Slices should extend from the aorta dorsally up to the spinous process of the vertebrae. Where there is noted pathology, adjust the angle of the slices a bit for the best visualization. | + | On a mid sagittal image, plan the slices parallel with the spinal cord. Slices should extend from the aorta dorsally up to the spinous process of the vertebrae. Where there is noted pathology, adjust the angle of the slices a bit for the best visualization. On thoracic spine dorsal imaging, the angle of the slices may be straight parallel to the body, or adjusted to emphasize pathology; be sure to clarify with the clinician. |
| {{: | {{: | ||
| - | + | {{: | |
| - | ====Typical Scan Protocol==== | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | The protocol below represents a full thoracolumbar exam. There is a lot of variation depending on the clinical question and clinician preference. The **minimum** recommended sequences depend on pathology, so no sequences are in bold. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Sagittal T2 Lumbar\\ | + | |
| - | Sagittal T2 Thoracic\\ | + | |
| - | Sagittal STIR Lumbar\\ | + | |
| - | Sagittal STIR Thoracic\\ | + | |
| - | Sagittal T1 Lumbar\\ | + | |
| - | Sagittal T1 Thoracic\\ | + | |
| - | Axial T2 ROI\\ | + | |
| - | Axial T1 ROI\\ | + | |
| - | __Contrast__\\ | + | |
| - | Sagittal T1 ROI\\ | + | |
| - | Axial T1 ROI\\ | + | |
| ====Tips and Tricks==== | ====Tips and Tricks==== | ||
| Line 69: | Line 68: | ||
| {{: | {{: | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==T2* Weighting== | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{: | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==T2 Weighting== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Most modern scanners will have an option for a Driven Equilibrium pulse sequence that incorporates and additional -90 degree pulse to 'flip back' the transverse magnetization along the Z axis. This has the effect of speeding up longitudinal recovery even for very long T1 tissues like CSF, meaning that it isn't necessary to have very long TR's. When performing a T2 weighted sequence with this modification, | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||