Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision		Previous revision
library:thoracolumbar_spine [2026/06/10 20:49] – [Sagittal Plane] scottlibrary:thoracolumbar_spine [2026/07/20 13:56] (current) – scott
Line 5: Line 5:
 =====Scan Coverage and Planning===== =====Scan Coverage and Planning=====
  
-The thoracolumbar spine (TL Spine) is the more complex area of the CNS to scan clinically, as the coverage is much broader since both the full thoracic spine and lumbar spine are included. There are various protocol for scanning the TL spine that can vary quite a bit from clinician to clinician, so it is best to establish clinician preference ahead of time. The most important image to acquire accurately is the sagittal, since this is where pathology is initially identified, and the image from which axial sequences are planned. Poor quality sagittal images will hinder identifying pathology, which can greatly extend scan and anesthesia time. There are two primary paths for TL spine scanning in regards to sagittal imaging: Whole Spine or Separate.+The thoracolumbar spine (TL Spine) is the more complex area of the CNS to scan clinically. The coverage is much broader since both the full thoracic spine and lumbar spine are included. There are various protocols for scanning the TL spine that can vary quite a bit from clinician to clinician, so it is best to establish clinician preference ahead of time. The most important image to acquire accurately is the sagittal, since this is where pathology is initially identified, and the image from which axial sequences are planned. Poor quality sagittal images will hinder identifying pathology, which can greatly extend scan and anesthesia time. There are two primary paths for TL spine scanning in regards to sagittal imaging: Whole Spine or Separate.
  
 ===Whole Spine Coverage=== ===Whole Spine Coverage===
Line 11: Line 11:
 With Whole Spine coverage, the FOV for sagittal series should extend from T3 to S2. **Be sure to plan an ODD number of slices to ensure there is at least one true mid-sagittal image.** There are several difficulties and limitations with whole spine imaging: With Whole Spine coverage, the FOV for sagittal series should extend from T3 to S2. **Be sure to plan an ODD number of slices to ensure there is at least one true mid-sagittal image.** There are several difficulties and limitations with whole spine imaging:
   - The maximum FOV for scanners varies, and may be limited by the size of the dog, so whole spine coverage is only appropriate for small to medium breeds   - The maximum FOV for scanners varies, and may be limited by the size of the dog, so whole spine coverage is only appropriate for small to medium breeds
-  - The maximum number of coils that may be active at a time may be limited (GE)+  - The maximum number of coils that may be active at a time may be limited 
   - Positioning becomes more difficult, as slight curvatures of the spine will limit the accuracy of sagittal imaging, necessitating repositioning, or very thin slices.   - Positioning becomes more difficult, as slight curvatures of the spine will limit the accuracy of sagittal imaging, necessitating repositioning, or very thin slices.
   - The scanning technologist will have to do a lot of 'zoom/pan' at the time of scanning to locate pathology and plan axials   - The scanning technologist will have to do a lot of 'zoom/pan' at the time of scanning to locate pathology and plan axials
Line 42: Line 42:
 On a mid-sagittal image, plan axial slices perpendicular to the spinal cord. Unlike the cervical spine, the angle for the intervertebral disc and the spinal cord are very well aligned and can be considered equivalent. There are two variations of axial acquisitions, **Single Stack or Multi Stack**. This is largely up to clinician preference, but there are some good practices to consider.  On a mid-sagittal image, plan axial slices perpendicular to the spinal cord. Unlike the cervical spine, the angle for the intervertebral disc and the spinal cord are very well aligned and can be considered equivalent. There are two variations of axial acquisitions, **Single Stack or Multi Stack**. This is largely up to clinician preference, but there are some good practices to consider. 
  
-  * **Multi Stack**: With disc disease, extrusions tend to be fairly localized, though in rare cases may extend cranially or caudally. Multi Stack is often appropriate and more time efficient for this, especially when assessing a large number of discs. It is good practice to use 3-7 slices, centered on the disc, for each disc. where pathology is suspected, it is also good practice to use enough axial slices to extend to the mid-body of the vertebrae above and below the suspected disc extrusion to catch any disc material not well visualized on a sagittal image. On the Multi Stack plan shown below, note the angle required at the LS junction; significant slice overlap will cause artifact, and in some cases may need to be consolidated into a Single Stack. +  * **Multi Stack**: With disc disease, extrusions tend to be fairly localized, though in rare cases may extend cranially or caudally and require modification in your planning. Multi Stack is often appropriate and more time efficient for typical cases, especially when assessing a large number of discs and when accounting for the ventral/dorsal curvature of the spine. It is good practice to use 3-7 slices, centered on the disc, for each disc. Where pathology is suspected, it is also good practice to use enough axial slices to extend to the mid-body of the vertebrae above and below the suspected disc extrusion to catch any disc material not well visualized on a sagittal image. On the Multi Stack plan shown below, note the angle required at the LS junction; significant slice overlap will cause artifact, and in some cases may need to be consolidated into a Single Stack.
-  * **Single Stack**: With spinal cord pathology such as FCE or myelopathy, disc assessment is less important. Single Stack is most appropriate in this situation. It is good practice to acquire the axial stack from normal cord-to-normal cord if possible.+
  
-{{:library:lspineaxplansinglestack.png?600|}}  {{:library:lspineaxplanmultistack.png?600|}}+{{:library:lspineaxplanmultistack.png?600|}} 
 + 
 +  * **Single Stack**: With spinal cord pathology such as FCE or myelopathy, disc assessment is less important. Single Stack is most appropriate in this situation. It is good practice to acquire the axial stack from 'normal cord' to 'normal cord' if possible. 
 + 
 +{{:library:lspineaxplansinglestack.png?600|}}  
  
 ====Dorsal Plane==== ====Dorsal Plane====
  
-On a mid sagittal image, plan the slices parallel with the spinal cord. Slices should extend from the aorta dorsally up to the spinous process of the vertebrae. Where there is noted pathology, adjust the angle of the slices a bit for the best visualization.+On a mid sagittal image, plan the slices parallel with the spinal cord. Slices should extend from the aorta dorsally up to the spinous process of the vertebrae. Where there is noted pathology, adjust the angle of the slices a bit for the best visualization. On thoracic spine dorsal imaging, the angle of the slices may be straight parallel to the body, or adjusted to emphasize pathology; be sure to clarify with the clinician.
  
 {{:library:lspinedorplan.png?600|}}  {{:library:lspinedornormal.png?600|}} {{:library:lspinedorplan.png?600|}}  {{:library:lspinedornormal.png?600|}}
 +
 +{{:library:dorplanthoracic.png?600|}}  {{:library:dorthoracicnorm.png?600|}}
  
 ====Tips and Tricks==== ====Tips and Tricks====